<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 95 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54119</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals in a customs case involving the importation of a textile machine from Japan. The Tribunal found no evidence to suggest the declared price was not genuine, relying on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice and payment records. Emphasizing that mere comparison of invoices is not conclusive for determining under valuation, the Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding contemporaneous imports, the department&#039;s right to re-open assessment, and the comparison of transaction values. The decision was made after a thorough review of the case records and was pronounced in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:09:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 95 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54119</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals in a customs case involving the importation of a textile machine from Japan. The Tribunal found no evidence to suggest the declared price was not genuine, relying on the manufacturer&#039;s invoice and payment records. Emphasizing that mere comparison of invoices is not conclusive for determining under valuation, the Tribunal upheld the Order-in-Appeal, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s arguments regarding contemporaneous imports, the department&#039;s right to re-open assessment, and the comparison of transaction values. The decision was made after a thorough review of the case records and was pronounced in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>