<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799649</link>
    <description>Statutory appellate remedy before the Securities Appellate Tribunal provides an efficacious forum to challenge SEBI interim directions, including objections to the scope of imposed restrictions. Although the challenge appeared arguable at first glance, no prima facie view was recorded. Writ jurisdiction was not invoked; the petition was disposed of with liberty to approach the appropriate appellate forum, while preserving all rights and contentions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925857" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1675 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799649</link>
      <description>Statutory appellate remedy before the Securities Appellate Tribunal provides an efficacious forum to challenge SEBI interim directions, including objections to the scope of imposed restrictions. Although the challenge appeared arguable at first glance, no prima facie view was recorded. Writ jurisdiction was not invoked; the petition was disposed of with liberty to approach the appropriate appellate forum, while preserving all rights and contentions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>