<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1680 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799654</link>
    <description>Tariff reclassification requires Revenue to establish each proposed entry through disclosed, article-specific evidence applying the General Rules for Interpretation, relevant notes and Explanatory Notes. Generalised conclusions, undisclosed website material, reversal of the burden of proof and disregard of binding appellate precedent undermine a speaking classification determination. Absent proven reclassification, the declared classification and consequential concessional-notification benefit continue; accepted revised classification of other articles remains subject to limitation and quantification. Extended limitation requires pleaded and proved culpable conduct, while a corrigendum cannot introduce fresh charges retrospectively. Incorrect classification alone does not establish confiscation where description and value are undisputed, and unsupported duty demands cannot sustain redemption fine, penalty or interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1680 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799654</link>
      <description>Tariff reclassification requires Revenue to establish each proposed entry through disclosed, article-specific evidence applying the General Rules for Interpretation, relevant notes and Explanatory Notes. Generalised conclusions, undisclosed website material, reversal of the burden of proof and disregard of binding appellate precedent undermine a speaking classification determination. Absent proven reclassification, the declared classification and consequential concessional-notification benefit continue; accepted revised classification of other articles remains subject to limitation and quantification. Extended limitation requires pleaded and proved culpable conduct, while a corrigendum cannot introduce fresh charges retrospectively. Incorrect classification alone does not establish confiscation where description and value are undisputed, and unsupported duty demands cannot sustain redemption fine, penalty or interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799654</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>