<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1744 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799718</link>
    <description>Challenges to curtailment of benefits under the budgetary-support scheme were governed by an earlier precedent applying a Supreme Court ruling. Rather than independently examining the validity of the notification, affected claimants were permitted to submit representations to the State Government and the GST Council. Their claims are to be considered in accordance with law, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue that route.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925788" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1744 - GAUHATI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799718</link>
      <description>Challenges to curtailment of benefits under the budgetary-support scheme were governed by an earlier precedent applying a Supreme Court ruling. Rather than independently examining the validity of the notification, affected claimants were permitted to submit representations to the State Government and the GST Council. Their claims are to be considered in accordance with law, and the writ petition was disposed of with liberty to pursue that route.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799718</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>