<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Pending arbitration does not bar wilful-defaulter proceedings over alleged unauthorised disposal of secured assets before committee review.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104139</link>
    <description>Pendency of arbitration over underlying loan transactions does not prevent initiation of wilful-defaulter proceedings where borrowers are alleged to have disposed of assets securing credit facilities without lender approval. Such alleged conduct falls within the RBI Directions, 2024, and a show-cause notice founded on identified assets and supplied documentary material represents only a prima facie view. Borrowers must respond before the competent committees decide the matter and may use the available review process thereafter. The challenge was treated as premature; the notice remained in force and the response period was extended by two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Pending arbitration does not bar wilful-defaulter proceedings over alleged unauthorised disposal of secured assets before committee review.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104139</link>
      <description>Pendency of arbitration over underlying loan transactions does not prevent initiation of wilful-defaulter proceedings where borrowers are alleged to have disposed of assets securing credit facilities without lender approval. Such alleged conduct falls within the RBI Directions, 2024, and a show-cause notice founded on identified assets and supplied documentary material represents only a prima facie view. Borrowers must respond before the competent committees decide the matter and may use the available review process thereafter. The challenge was treated as premature; the notice remained in force and the response period was extended by two weeks.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 08:16:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>