<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 156 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54095</link>
    <description>Remission of excise duty under Rule 49 was confined to goods lost or destroyed by natural causes or unavoidable accident while in a storeroom or other approved premises before clearance. As the goods were lost after clearance from the factory and during transit to the port, the rule did not apply. Remission was therefore unavailable for the transit loss, and the claim was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:06:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 156 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54095</link>
      <description>Remission of excise duty under Rule 49 was confined to goods lost or destroyed by natural causes or unavoidable accident while in a storeroom or other approved premises before clearance. As the goods were lost after clearance from the factory and during transit to the port, the rule did not apply. Remission was therefore unavailable for the transit loss, and the claim was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54095</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>