<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 290 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54094</link>
    <description>A notification restricting utilisation of Cenvat credit was applied prospectively and could not curtail credit lawfully accumulated before its commencement. Credit earned before 18-8-2000 remained available for duty payment on clearances made after that date, because the notification did not clearly indicate an intention to take away accrued entitlement. The assessees&#039; use of the pre-existing credit was therefore valid, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:05:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 290 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54094</link>
      <description>A notification restricting utilisation of Cenvat credit was applied prospectively and could not curtail credit lawfully accumulated before its commencement. Credit earned before 18-8-2000 remained available for duty payment on clearances made after that date, because the notification did not clearly indicate an intention to take away accrued entitlement. The assessees&#039; use of the pre-existing credit was therefore valid, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54094</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>