<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 154 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54090</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal held that certain charges should not be included in the assessable value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, as they are not considered transport costs. The demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 09:59:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 154 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54090</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal held that certain charges should not be included in the assessable value under Section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, as they are not considered transport costs. The demand was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54090</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>