<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 285 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54075</link>
    <description>Control panels used exclusively for wind-operated electricity generators were treated as parts of wind-mills and therefore fell within Sl. No. 12 of the Table to Notification No. 205/88-C.E. The Tribunal relied on its earlier final order in the same assessee&#039;s case and accepted that the exemption applied to the subject goods. The departmental objection was rejected, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge to exemption eligibility failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:06:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 285 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54075</link>
      <description>Control panels used exclusively for wind-operated electricity generators were treated as parts of wind-mills and therefore fell within Sl. No. 12 of the Table to Notification No. 205/88-C.E. The Tribunal relied on its earlier final order in the same assessee&#039;s case and accepted that the exemption applied to the subject goods. The departmental objection was rejected, so the Revenue&#039;s challenge to exemption eligibility failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>