https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54074 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the Designated Authority's decision to impose anti-dumping duties on imports from Brazil, Japan, Korea RP, and Singapore. It held that the petitioner represented a significant portion of domestic production and established a causal link between dumped imports and material injury to the domestic industry. The Tribunal found that the appellants, as known importers, were entitled to appeal under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, despite not importing during the investigation period. The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's evaluation of injury parameters, confirming that the domestic industry's injury was due to dumped imports, not internal competition. en-us Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 24 Apr 2024 16:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54074 The Tribunal dismissed the appeals, affirming the Designated Authority's decision to impose anti-dumping duties on imports from Brazil, Japan, Korea RP, and Singapore. It held that the petitioner represented a significant portion of domestic production and established a causal link between dumped imports and material injury to the domestic industry. The Tribunal found that the appellants, as known importers, were entitled to appeal under Section 9C of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, despite not importing during the investigation period. The Tribunal upheld the Designated Authority's evaluation of injury parameters, confirming that the domestic industry's injury was due to dumped imports, not internal competition. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 28 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54074