<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1598 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799572</link>
    <description>Transportation forming the principal element of a composite arrangement, with loading merely ancillary, is classifiable as transportation rather than Cargo Handling Service under Section 66F(3)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994. Loading at a single point and separate contractual and billing arrangements did not establish specialised cargo-handling activity. Tax already discharged under a centralised registration cannot be demanded again under a surrendered registration for the same service and value. The extended limitation period was unavailable where the notice relied on income-tax returns and Form 26AS and the dispute concerned service classification. The service-tax demands, interest and penalties were consequently set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:27:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925486" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1598 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799572</link>
      <description>Transportation forming the principal element of a composite arrangement, with loading merely ancillary, is classifiable as transportation rather than Cargo Handling Service under Section 66F(3)(a) of the Finance Act, 1994. Loading at a single point and separate contractual and billing arrangements did not establish specialised cargo-handling activity. Tax already discharged under a centralised registration cannot be demanded again under a surrendered registration for the same service and value. The extended limitation period was unavailable where the notice relied on income-tax returns and Form 26AS and the dispute concerned service classification. The service-tax demands, interest and penalties were consequently set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799572</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>