<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1602 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799576</link>
    <description>Suspension of an insolvency professional&#039;s registration applies across all insolvency assignments because registration is the statutory basis for acting in any insolvency process. Intimation of suspension to Committees of Creditors and the Adjudicating Authority operationalises that consequence and does not exercise the separate replacement power of a Committee of Creditors. Ad-interim relief against a public-interest disciplinary order requires a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury; no sufficiently strong basis was established. Regulation 18(3) was treated as governing agenda placement without prima facie requiring prior intra-class majority approval. The requested stay was declined, while proportionality and disciplinary merits remain open for final determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:27:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1602 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799576</link>
      <description>Suspension of an insolvency professional&#039;s registration applies across all insolvency assignments because registration is the statutory basis for acting in any insolvency process. Intimation of suspension to Committees of Creditors and the Adjudicating Authority operationalises that consequence and does not exercise the separate replacement power of a Committee of Creditors. Ad-interim relief against a public-interest disciplinary order requires a prima facie case, balance of convenience and irreparable injury; no sufficiently strong basis was established. Regulation 18(3) was treated as governing agenda placement without prima facie requiring prior intra-class majority approval. The requested stay was declined, while proportionality and disciplinary merits remain open for final determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799576</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>