<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1614 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799588</link>
    <description>Provisional release of goods seized under the NDPS Act may be considered under Article 226 in exceptional circumstances where the goods remain in Customs custody and the dispute concerns the effect of a later export authorisation rather than criminal liability for seizure. Export remains subject to prescribed authorisation. Where an earlier authorisation expired before filing of the shipping bill, but the licensing authority cancelled it and issued a fresh valid authorisation for the same goods and overseas consignee, the later authorisation may support provisional release. A technical delay in obtaining authorisation, without intent to export unauthorised goods, need not defeat release; statutory adjudication and criminal processes remain available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:27:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1614 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799588</link>
      <description>Provisional release of goods seized under the NDPS Act may be considered under Article 226 in exceptional circumstances where the goods remain in Customs custody and the dispute concerns the effect of a later export authorisation rather than criminal liability for seizure. Export remains subject to prescribed authorisation. Where an earlier authorisation expired before filing of the shipping bill, but the licensing authority cancelled it and issued a fresh valid authorisation for the same goods and overseas consignee, the later authorisation may support provisional release. A technical delay in obtaining authorisation, without intent to export unauthorised goods, need not defeat release; statutory adjudication and criminal processes remain available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799588</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>