https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104116 Section 260-A permits a High Court appeal only where a substantial question of law arises; it does not allow reappreciation of evidence or replacement of concurrent factual findings. Concurrent findings that road and infrastructure works qualified the assessee as a developer eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4) were based on the record, with no perversity or erroneous legal test shown. Reliance on a previously confirmed Tribunal order and dismissal of a similar appeal for another assessment year did not create a substantial question of law. The Department's appeal was dismissed. en-us Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:27:07 +0530 Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:27:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104116 Section 260-A permits a High Court appeal only where a substantial question of law arises; it does not allow reappreciation of evidence or replacement of concurrent factual findings. Concurrent findings that road and infrastructure works qualified the assessee as a developer eligible for deduction under section 80-IA(4) were based on the record, with no perversity or erroneous legal test shown. Reliance on a previously confirmed Tribunal order and dismissal of a similar appeal for another assessment year did not create a substantial question of law. The Department's appeal was dismissed. Highlights Income Tax Thu, 24 Sep 2026 08:27:07 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104116