<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 63 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54061</link>
    <description>Decatising of man-made fabrics was examined against Notification No. 9/96 for exemption from duty. The adjudicating authority treated calendering as a covered finishing process but regarded decatising as a distinct final-stage treatment, relying on textile dictionary meanings. No reliable technical material or other satisfactory basis was produced to displace that view. On that basis, decatising was held to fall outside the scope of the exemption notification, and the duty demand was sustained against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92538" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 63 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54061</link>
      <description>Decatising of man-made fabrics was examined against Notification No. 9/96 for exemption from duty. The adjudicating authority treated calendering as a covered finishing process but regarded decatising as a distinct final-stage treatment, relying on textile dictionary meanings. No reliable technical material or other satisfactory basis was produced to displace that view. On that basis, decatising was held to fall outside the scope of the exemption notification, and the duty demand was sustained against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>