https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471917 Aggressors injured while victims exercise private defence of person or property do not thereby acquire a corresponding right of private defence. Where the accused are established as aggressors, the occurrence takes place on land possessed by the injured person, and the defence version is inconsistent and rejected on evidence, the prosecution's failure to explain the aggressors' injuries does not invalidate the prosecution case. No right of private defence arose for the appellants, and their convictions with the aid of Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code were sustained. en-us Fri, 03 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:21:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471917 Aggressors injured while victims exercise private defence of person or property do not thereby acquire a corresponding right of private defence. Where the accused are established as aggressors, the occurrence takes place on land possessed by the injured person, and the defence version is inconsistent and rejected on evidence, the prosecution's failure to explain the aggressors' injuries does not invalidate the prosecution case. No right of private defence arose for the appellants, and their convictions with the aid of Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code were sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 03 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471917