https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471916 Criminal review jurisdiction is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record; applications framed as clarifications, modifications, or directions cannot be used to secure a rehearing. In criminal appeals, Articles 136 and 142 permit consequential directions, including retrial before a court outside the State, where necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice. The transfer procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not curtail that appellate power when the matter is already before the Supreme Court. Observations concerning prosecution conduct, investigation, and defects in the earlier trial do not determine guilt; the retrial court must independently assess the evidence on its merits. en-us Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:03:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471916 Criminal review jurisdiction is confined to an error apparent on the face of the record; applications framed as clarifications, modifications, or directions cannot be used to secure a rehearing. In criminal appeals, Articles 136 and 142 permit consequential directions, including retrial before a court outside the State, where necessary to prevent miscarriage of justice. The transfer procedure under the Code of Criminal Procedure does not curtail that appellate power when the matter is already before the Supreme Court. Observations concerning prosecution conduct, investigation, and defects in the earlier trial do not determine guilt; the retrial court must independently assess the evidence on its merits. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 May 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471916