<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 128 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the anti-dumping duty imposition on Compact Fluorescent Lamps from China PR and Hong Kong. The appellant&#039;s objections regarding their participation, interest, and normal value determination were not upheld. Lack of substantial grounds for challenge, failure to establish locus standi, and procedural compliance by the designated authority led to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 16:22:23 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 128 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the appeal challenging the anti-dumping duty imposition on Compact Fluorescent Lamps from China PR and Hong Kong. The appellant&#039;s objections regarding their participation, interest, and normal value determination were not upheld. Lack of substantial grounds for challenge, failure to establish locus standi, and procedural compliance by the designated authority led to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>