<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (6) TMI 1612 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471915</link>
    <description>COVID-19 extension of limitation applied only to the prescribed statutory period for filing an insolvency appeal and did not extend the additional period available for condonation of delay. Where an appellant knew of the impugned order but neither filed the appeal nor sought a certified copy within the prescribed period, the conditions for invoking the extension were not satisfied. The appeal was consequently barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 17:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (6) TMI 1612 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471915</link>
      <description>COVID-19 extension of limitation applied only to the prescribed statutory period for filing an insolvency appeal and did not extend the additional period available for condonation of delay. Where an appellant knew of the impugned order but neither filed the appeal nor sought a certified copy within the prescribed period, the conditions for invoking the extension were not satisfied. The appeal was consequently barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471915</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>