<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1506 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799480</link>
    <description>The first proviso to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act provides a discretionary exemption from the twin bail conditions where the laundering amount attributable to an individual accused is below the monetary threshold. Attribution must be assessed separately for each accused and not mechanically equated with total proceeds of crime alleged against a wider group. Section 3 addresses knowing assistance in processes involving proceeds of crime, and Section 23 creates a presumption for interconnected transactions. Bail cancellation requires a perverse, fallacious, or investigation-prejudicial exercise of discretion; custody need not continue where bail conditions adequately secure investigation and trial attendance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925270" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1506 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799480</link>
      <description>The first proviso to Section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act provides a discretionary exemption from the twin bail conditions where the laundering amount attributable to an individual accused is below the monetary threshold. Attribution must be assessed separately for each accused and not mechanically equated with total proceeds of crime alleged against a wider group. Section 3 addresses knowing assistance in processes involving proceeds of crime, and Section 23 creates a presumption for interconnected transactions. Bail cancellation requires a perverse, fallacious, or investigation-prejudicial exercise of discretion; custody need not continue where bail conditions adequately secure investigation and trial attendance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>