<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1549 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799523</link>
    <description>Penalty liability under Section 271(1)(c) for periods before 1 April 2016 requires application of Circular No. 25/2015 rather than automatic reliance on Explanation 4. The Circular treats the relevant explanation as prospective and makes penalty following an adjustment to computed income dependent on the nature of that adjustment. Where this framework was not considered, the penalty order and consequential demand notice were quashed, and the penalty liability was remitted for reconsideration under the Circular.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1549 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799523</link>
      <description>Penalty liability under Section 271(1)(c) for periods before 1 April 2016 requires application of Circular No. 25/2015 rather than automatic reliance on Explanation 4. The Circular treats the relevant explanation as prospective and makes penalty following an adjustment to computed income dependent on the nature of that adjustment. Where this framework was not considered, the penalty order and consequential demand notice were quashed, and the penalty liability was remitted for reconsideration under the Circular.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>