<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1551 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799525</link>
    <description>Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act requires the first appellate authority to formulate points for determination and decide each appeal by recorded reasons. This duty continues even if the appellant does not attend the hearing. An income-tax appeal cannot therefore be dismissed solely for non-appearance without adjudicating the grounds raised; such dismissal contravenes the statutory requirement for a reasoned appellate decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925225" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1551 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799525</link>
      <description>Section 250(6) of the Income-tax Act requires the first appellate authority to formulate points for determination and decide each appeal by recorded reasons. This duty continues even if the appellant does not attend the hearing. An income-tax appeal cannot therefore be dismissed solely for non-appearance without adjudicating the grounds raised; such dismissal contravenes the statutory requirement for a reasoned appellate decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799525</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>