https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54045 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of P.C.C. Poles, regarding the liability of interest and penalty under Rule 7(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Despite the payment of the differential duty within the specified timeframe, interest and a personal penalty were imposed. The court found the interest and penalty unwarranted as the appellant had paid the duty promptly. The appellant was granted relief as the payment was made within the stipulated time frame, leading to the appeal's success. en-us Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Oct 2010 15:45:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54045 The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellant, a manufacturer of P.C.C. Poles, regarding the liability of interest and penalty under Rule 7(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. Despite the payment of the differential duty within the specified timeframe, interest and a personal penalty were imposed. The court found the interest and penalty unwarranted as the appellant had paid the duty promptly. The appellant was granted relief as the payment was made within the stipulated time frame, leading to the appeal's success. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54045