<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1557 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799531</link>
    <description>Pendency of a statutory appeal against an assessment order supported declining discretionary writ jurisdiction. High Court disposed of the writ petition without examining the merits or the asserted jurisdictional defect, leaving those matters for the appellate process. The appellate authority was requested to determine the pending statutory appeal expeditiously, so the available appellate remedy remained the route for resolving the assessment challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1557 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799531</link>
      <description>Pendency of a statutory appeal against an assessment order supported declining discretionary writ jurisdiction. High Court disposed of the writ petition without examining the merits or the asserted jurisdictional defect, leaving those matters for the appellate process. The appellate authority was requested to determine the pending statutory appeal expeditiously, so the available appellate remedy remained the route for resolving the assessment challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799531</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>