<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1559 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799533</link>
    <description>Recovery of a tax demand pending a first appeal may be stayed where aggregated and apparently repetitive import information, without invoice-wise or bill-of-entry-wise details, prevents meaningful reconciliation with the assessee&#039;s complete accounting records. Such circumstances create a strong prima facie concern of breach of natural justice; a high-pitched assessment and resulting undue hardship further support protection from recovery. Administrative memoranda requiring payment of 20% of the demand do not restrict the Court&#039;s power to grant an appropriate stay, and no deposit need be imposed where the facts justify full protection. The appellate authority must decide the appeal promptly and independently on its merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2026 08:48:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=925217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1559 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799533</link>
      <description>Recovery of a tax demand pending a first appeal may be stayed where aggregated and apparently repetitive import information, without invoice-wise or bill-of-entry-wise details, prevents meaningful reconciliation with the assessee&#039;s complete accounting records. Such circumstances create a strong prima facie concern of breach of natural justice; a high-pitched assessment and resulting undue hardship further support protection from recovery. Administrative memoranda requiring payment of 20% of the demand do not restrict the Court&#039;s power to grant an appropriate stay, and no deposit need be imposed where the facts justify full protection. The appellate authority must decide the appeal promptly and independently on its merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>