<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 131 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54035</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all nine appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and penalties. It directed the release of the goods, classifying them as copper concentrate, and emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and reliance on conclusive evidence. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, deemed the demands time-barred, and invalidated penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal also highlighted the lack of conclusive evidence to classify the goods as hazardous waste and criticized the procedural lapses, including the denial of personal hearings, which violated principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 131 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54035</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all nine appeals, setting aside the impugned orders and penalties. It directed the release of the goods, classifying them as copper concentrate, and emphasized the necessity of procedural fairness and reliance on conclusive evidence. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration or suppression of facts, deemed the demands time-barred, and invalidated penalties under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Tribunal also highlighted the lack of conclusive evidence to classify the goods as hazardous waste and criticized the procedural lapses, including the denial of personal hearings, which violated principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54035</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>