<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 124 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54027</link>
    <description>The final order set aside the previous decision and remanded the case to the original authority for a de novo determination of the refund amount and interest due. The original authority was instructed to conduct a hearing with the appellants and process the refund, requiring an indemnity bond if necessary. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the Deputy Commissioner for reconsideration on 15-7-2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 13:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92504" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 124 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54027</link>
      <description>The final order set aside the previous decision and remanded the case to the original authority for a de novo determination of the refund amount and interest due. The original authority was instructed to conduct a hearing with the appellants and process the refund, requiring an indemnity bond if necessary. The appeal was allowed, and the matter was remitted to the Deputy Commissioner for reconsideration on 15-7-2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54027</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>