<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54023</link>
    <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods must be proved by positive, corroborative evidence linking the alleged clearances to the assessee. Statements, loose papers and materials recovered from associated concerns, without reliable linkage to removals from the appellant&#039;s premises, were held insufficient; suspicion and unverified third-party records could not substitute for proof. The charge therefore failed, and the duty demand, confiscation of seized goods and penalties were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:51:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 342 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54023</link>
      <description>Clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods must be proved by positive, corroborative evidence linking the alleged clearances to the assessee. Statements, loose papers and materials recovered from associated concerns, without reliable linkage to removals from the appellant&#039;s premises, were held insufficient; suspicion and unverified third-party records could not substitute for proof. The charge therefore failed, and the duty demand, confiscation of seized goods and penalties were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>