<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471890</link>
    <description>Surcharge under the Finance Act, 2022 arose only when returned income exceeded the prescribed statutory threshold. Returned income below that threshold did not attract surcharge, particularly where the appellate position had accepted that factual basis. A contrary statistical disposal was inconsistent with the accepted income finding; consequently, the surcharge adjustment required deletion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471890</link>
      <description>Surcharge under the Finance Act, 2022 arose only when returned income exceeded the prescribed statutory threshold. Returned income below that threshold did not attract surcharge, particularly where the appellate position had accepted that factual basis. A contrary statistical disposal was inconsistent with the accepted income finding; consequently, the surcharge adjustment required deletion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471890</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>