<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1863 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471894</link>
    <description>Penalty notices for furnishing inaccurate particulars must clearly state the precise charge under Section 271(1)(c), rather than leaving the relevant statutory limb unspecified. Read with Section 274, the notice must provide clear notice of the allegation forming the basis for penalty. Failure to identify the applicable limb invalidates the penalty proceedings and supports deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924947" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1863 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471894</link>
      <description>Penalty notices for furnishing inaccurate particulars must clearly state the precise charge under Section 271(1)(c), rather than leaving the relevant statutory limb unspecified. Read with Section 274, the notice must provide clear notice of the allegation forming the basis for penalty. Failure to identify the applicable limb invalidates the penalty proceedings and supports deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471894</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>