<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1909 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471896</link>
    <description>Rule 96(10) was treated as invalid by a coordinate-bench ruling and was subsequently omitted. Those factors made its application to deny an integrated tax refund unsustainable. The order-in-appeal and consequential proceedings were quashed, requiring release of the integrated tax refund with applicable interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 13:47:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1909 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471896</link>
      <description>Rule 96(10) was treated as invalid by a coordinate-bench ruling and was subsequently omitted. Those factors made its application to deny an integrated tax refund unsustainable. The order-in-appeal and consequential proceedings were quashed, requiring release of the integrated tax refund with applicable interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>