<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 122 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54013</link>
    <description>Leveling and cutting CR/HR coils or strips into sheets and plates was treated as not amounting to manufacture because the processed goods did not emerge as a distinct commercially different product from the inputs. The later Board circular, issued in light of the Delhi HC ruling on the same issue, governed the dispute, and the contrary Supreme Court authority relied on by the department was found inapplicable on these facts. The excise duty demand was therefore unsustainable, and the consequential penalties could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 13:25:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 122 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54013</link>
      <description>Leveling and cutting CR/HR coils or strips into sheets and plates was treated as not amounting to manufacture because the processed goods did not emerge as a distinct commercially different product from the inputs. The later Board circular, issued in light of the Delhi HC ruling on the same issue, governed the dispute, and the contrary Supreme Court authority relied on by the department was found inapplicable on these facts. The excise duty demand was therefore unsustainable, and the consequential penalties could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54013</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>