<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (9) TMI 1333 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471887</link>
    <description>Relevant orders issued by the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were to be supplied to the petitioner through counsel within two weeks, without prejudice to the respondent&#039;s rights and contentions. Upon receipt, the petitioner could pursue remedies available in law. The writ petition was disposed of on that limited basis.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 10:50:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (9) TMI 1333 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471887</link>
      <description>Relevant orders issued by the Adjudicating Authority and Appellate Authority under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 were to be supplied to the petitioner through counsel within two weeks, without prejudice to the respondent&#039;s rights and contentions. Upon receipt, the petitioner could pursue remedies available in law. The writ petition was disposed of on that limited basis.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>