https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799468 Successive writ petitions challenging the same adjudication order are not maintainable where an earlier petition was withdrawn without liberty to file afresh. The public-policy principle underlying withdrawal of proceedings treats such withdrawal as abandonment of the Article 226 remedy for that cause of action; altered grounds cannot support identical relief. Availability of the statutory GST appellate remedy also weighs against exercise of writ jurisdiction, particularly where it was not pursued promptly and the delay in approaching the court is unexplained. These principles preclude a later writ petition against the same adjudication order. en-us Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2026 09:30:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799468 Successive writ petitions challenging the same adjudication order are not maintainable where an earlier petition was withdrawn without liberty to file afresh. The public-policy principle underlying withdrawal of proceedings treats such withdrawal as abandonment of the Article 226 remedy for that cause of action; altered grounds cannot support identical relief. Availability of the statutory GST appellate remedy also weighs against exercise of writ jurisdiction, particularly where it was not pursued promptly and the delay in approaching the court is unexplained. These principles preclude a later writ petition against the same adjudication order. Case-Laws GST Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799468