<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1431 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799405</link>
    <description>Rule 87A(4)(c) permits recovery of Registrar of Companies&#039; costs arising from an application or appeal for restoration of a company&#039;s name, unless otherwise directed. Because such costs have penal consequences, the amount must bear a rational relationship to actual costs incurred and be supported by a recorded computation or determination. Prolonged non-filing of financial statements, annual returns and income-tax returns remains a serious statutory default that cannot be excused by ignorance or oversight. However, an unsupported quantified restoration cost was found disproportionate and reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924811" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1431 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799405</link>
      <description>Rule 87A(4)(c) permits recovery of Registrar of Companies&#039; costs arising from an application or appeal for restoration of a company&#039;s name, unless otherwise directed. Because such costs have penal consequences, the amount must bear a rational relationship to actual costs incurred and be supported by a recorded computation or determination. Prolonged non-filing of financial statements, annual returns and income-tax returns remains a serious statutory default that cannot be excused by ignorance or oversight. However, an unsupported quantified restoration cost was found disproportionate and reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799405</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>