<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1451 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799425</link>
    <description>Penalty for an alleged contravention of the cash-receipt restrictions cannot survive where the underlying reassessment has been annulled and the corresponding addition deleted. The penalty was founded on the cash-transaction allegation in the quantum assessment and was consequential to the validity of that assessment. Once the assessment ceased to exist, there was no independent basis for the penalty. The penalty imposed under section 271D was therefore unsustainable and quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1451 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799425</link>
      <description>Penalty for an alleged contravention of the cash-receipt restrictions cannot survive where the underlying reassessment has been annulled and the corresponding addition deleted. The penalty was founded on the cash-transaction allegation in the quantum assessment and was consequential to the validity of that assessment. Once the assessment ceased to exist, there was no independent basis for the penalty. The penalty imposed under section 271D was therefore unsustainable and quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799425</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>