<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53999</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the Revenue failed to establish the companies as related persons under the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for further examination regarding the clubbing of clearance values and the imposition of penalties, adhering to principles of natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 14:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92476" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 268 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53999</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, determining that the Revenue failed to establish the companies as related persons under the Central Excise Act. Consequently, the case was remanded to the Adjudicating Authority for further examination regarding the clubbing of clearance values and the imposition of penalties, adhering to principles of natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53999</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>