<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Excess GST realisation alone cannot establish apartment-sale profiteering where no GST rate reduction or input tax credit benefit exists.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104036</link>
    <description>Anti-profiteering under section 171 of the CGST Act requires a benefit arising from a GST rate reduction or additional input tax credit to be passed to recipients through a commensurate price reduction. For affordable apartments launched and booked after GST commenced, the agreed price already reflected applicable GST rates and no pre-GST CENVAT credit was available for comparison with post-GST input tax credit. Differential GST realisation from purchasers does not constitute a saving or profiteering benefit under section 171. A profiteering computation founded on alleged excess GST recovery was therefore rejected, as recovery of excess GST falls outside the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction; the excess amount was to be refunded in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924750" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Excess GST realisation alone cannot establish apartment-sale profiteering where no GST rate reduction or input tax credit benefit exists.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104036</link>
      <description>Anti-profiteering under section 171 of the CGST Act requires a benefit arising from a GST rate reduction or additional input tax credit to be passed to recipients through a commensurate price reduction. For affordable apartments launched and booked after GST commenced, the agreed price already reflected applicable GST rates and no pre-GST CENVAT credit was available for comparison with post-GST input tax credit. Differential GST realisation from purchasers does not constitute a saving or profiteering benefit under section 171. A profiteering computation founded on alleged excess GST recovery was therefore rejected, as recovery of excess GST falls outside the Tribunal&#039;s jurisdiction; the excess amount was to be refunded in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104036</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>