<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Foreign-exchange seizure powers permit scrutiny of post-commencement payments, while overseas-investment refusals require disclosed, rational reasons.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104009</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction remains available despite an alternate statutory remedy where the challenge concerns seizure power, jurisdictional facts or deficient administrative decision-making, although factual merits remain for the statutory authority. Foreign-exchange seizure powers cannot retrospectively reach completed pre-commencement transactions, but may extend to actual payments made after commencement under a continuing arrangement. Connected financial transactions may be examined as a whole to establish a preliminary reason to believe, and recorded reasons cannot later be replaced by new grounds. Regulatory and tax proceedings do not preclude an independent foreign-exchange inquiry. Refusal of an overseas-investment no-objection certificate requires disclosed, rational reasons linked to the investigation; the unreasoned refusal required fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Foreign-exchange seizure powers permit scrutiny of post-commencement payments, while overseas-investment refusals require disclosed, rational reasons.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104009</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction remains available despite an alternate statutory remedy where the challenge concerns seizure power, jurisdictional facts or deficient administrative decision-making, although factual merits remain for the statutory authority. Foreign-exchange seizure powers cannot retrospectively reach completed pre-commencement transactions, but may extend to actual payments made after commencement under a continuing arrangement. Connected financial transactions may be examined as a whole to establish a preliminary reason to believe, and recorded reasons cannot later be replaced by new grounds. Regulatory and tax proceedings do not preclude an independent foreign-exchange inquiry. Refusal of an overseas-investment no-objection certificate requires disclosed, rational reasons linked to the investigation; the unreasoned refusal required fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:53 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104009</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>