<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1665 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471860</link>
    <description>Undisputed substantive eligibility for a Section 80JJAA deduction should prevail over a technical return-processing default where the deduction was allowed in preceding and succeeding assessment years. Denial solely on that processing defect is inappropriate; the jurisdictional Assessing Officer must rectify the CPC intimation and complete a fresh assessment rather than reject an otherwise eligible claim.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924719" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1665 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471860</link>
      <description>Undisputed substantive eligibility for a Section 80JJAA deduction should prevail over a technical return-processing default where the deduction was allowed in preceding and succeeding assessment years. Denial solely on that processing defect is inappropriate; the jurisdictional Assessing Officer must rectify the CPC intimation and complete a fresh assessment rather than reject an otherwise eligible claim.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471860</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>