<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1476 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471873</link>
    <description>Search additions for purported non-genuine cash purchases require corroborative incriminating material; admissions made during inquiry, without such material, are not conclusive. Vouchers recorded in regular audited books and VAT records, reconciled with accepted sales and stock, and a prompt affidavit retracting admissions did not establish bogus purchases; the cash-purchase additions were deleted. An unsigned loose sheet and a departmental computer-generated interest calculation did not prove an advance, receipt of interest, or enforceable right to receive interest. The statutory presumption for seized material is rebuttable, and unidentified entries remained a dumb document; the notional interest addition was deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 08:17:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924706" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1476 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471873</link>
      <description>Search additions for purported non-genuine cash purchases require corroborative incriminating material; admissions made during inquiry, without such material, are not conclusive. Vouchers recorded in regular audited books and VAT records, reconciled with accepted sales and stock, and a prompt affidavit retracting admissions did not establish bogus purchases; the cash-purchase additions were deleted. An unsigned loose sheet and a departmental computer-generated interest calculation did not prove an advance, receipt of interest, or enforceable right to receive interest. The statutory presumption for seized material is rebuttable, and unidentified entries remained a dumb document; the notional interest addition was deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>