<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (7) TMI 1668 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471854</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 applies where an assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue interests. A deduction claimed under Section 80G requires verification against the statutory conditions for allowability when the assessment record does not show that the Assessing Officer examined the claim in the original assessment. The Section 80G deduction was therefore restored to the Assessing Officer solely for verification in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 15:31:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924620" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (7) TMI 1668 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471854</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction under Section 263 applies where an assessment is both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue interests. A deduction claimed under Section 80G requires verification against the statutory conditions for allowability when the assessment record does not show that the Assessing Officer examined the claim in the original assessment. The Section 80G deduction was therefore restored to the Assessing Officer solely for verification in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471854</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>