https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53984 The appellate tribunal set aside the confiscation order and granted consequential benefits due to the insufficiency of the verification process and the lack of evidence supporting the order. The appellant successfully argued that the verification through eye estimation was impermissible and legally flawed, as no demand could be based solely on eye estimation. Additionally, the order confiscating goods without proper evidence of removal without duty payment was deemed unsustainable, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant. en-us Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:13:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53984 The appellate tribunal set aside the confiscation order and granted consequential benefits due to the insufficiency of the verification process and the lack of evidence supporting the order. The appellant successfully argued that the verification through eye estimation was impermissible and legally flawed, as no demand could be based solely on eye estimation. Additionally, the order confiscating goods without proper evidence of removal without duty payment was deemed unsustainable, leading to the decision in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 16 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53984