<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 254 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53981</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that despite the appellants paying the duty and interest before the show cause notice, a penalty was justified as the duty was not paid on the specified due date. The Tribunal referenced a Supreme Court decision supporting this stance. The appellants&#039; argument that no penalty should apply if duty is paid before the notice was rejected as the duty payment was prompted by Departmental officers, not voluntary. The Tribunal imposed a reduced penalty of Rs. 1,20,000 for contravening Central Excise Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:08:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92458" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 254 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53981</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that despite the appellants paying the duty and interest before the show cause notice, a penalty was justified as the duty was not paid on the specified due date. The Tribunal referenced a Supreme Court decision supporting this stance. The appellants&#039; argument that no penalty should apply if duty is paid before the notice was rejected as the duty payment was prompted by Departmental officers, not voluntary. The Tribunal imposed a reduced penalty of Rs. 1,20,000 for contravening Central Excise Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>