<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 314 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53978</link>
    <description>Unsigned and unattested photocopies of foreign export declarations, without production of originals or independent proof of genuineness, were held insufficient to displace the declared transaction value of imported goods. The contemporaneous import evidence supported the importers&#039; declared price, and the surrounding materials, including the invoice and insurance cover, were not shown to be false. In the absence of concrete material establishing that the import invoices were fabricated or bogus, rejection of the declared value and enhancement of assessable value were unsustainable, and the consequential penalties could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 May 2024 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 314 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53978</link>
      <description>Unsigned and unattested photocopies of foreign export declarations, without production of originals or independent proof of genuineness, were held insufficient to displace the declared transaction value of imported goods. The contemporaneous import evidence supported the importers&#039; declared price, and the surrounding materials, including the invoice and insurance cover, were not shown to be false. In the absence of concrete material establishing that the import invoices were fabricated or bogus, rejection of the declared value and enhancement of assessable value were unsustainable, and the consequential penalties could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>