<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1385 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799359</link>
    <description>Fraudulent trading may be established under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code where cumulative documentary and circumstantial evidence shows that secured, high-value machinery was removed and replaced without creditor consent by materially lower-value equipment. Contemporaneous financing and hypothecation records, valuation reports, physical signs of removal, unverified asset identifiers, delayed possession and absent purchase records may support fraudulent purpose on a preponderance of probabilities, without direct proof of intent or a series of transactions. Earlier SARFAESI possession proceedings do not create estoppel or exclude jurisdiction. The contribution remedy restores the corporate debtor&#039;s depleted asset position; unsupported depreciation and substitute-equipment value assertions do not require reduction of the quantified contribution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:57:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924418" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1385 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799359</link>
      <description>Fraudulent trading may be established under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code where cumulative documentary and circumstantial evidence shows that secured, high-value machinery was removed and replaced without creditor consent by materially lower-value equipment. Contemporaneous financing and hypothecation records, valuation reports, physical signs of removal, unverified asset identifiers, delayed possession and absent purchase records may support fraudulent purpose on a preponderance of probabilities, without direct proof of intent or a series of transactions. Earlier SARFAESI possession proceedings do not create estoppel or exclude jurisdiction. The contribution remedy restores the corporate debtor&#039;s depleted asset position; unsupported depreciation and substitute-equipment value assertions do not require reduction of the quantified contribution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799359</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>