<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (9) TMI 1421 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799395</link>
    <description>E-way-bill validity may be extended in exceptional circumstances, including through a further eight-hour period after expiry. For goods in transit, a penalty for an expired e-way bill should account for otherwise valid accompanying documents, a short technical delay in obtaining extension, and absence of intent to evade tax. A rigid 200% penalty is disproportionate where interception follows shortly after the extension window; in such circumstances, a token fine and refund of the excess penalty are appropriate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 09:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924382" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (9) TMI 1421 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799395</link>
      <description>E-way-bill validity may be extended in exceptional circumstances, including through a further eight-hour period after expiry. For goods in transit, a penalty for an expired e-way bill should account for otherwise valid accompanying documents, a short technical delay in obtaining extension, and absence of intent to evade tax. A rigid 200% penalty is disproportionate where interception follows shortly after the extension window; in such circumstances, a token fine and refund of the excess penalty are appropriate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=799395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>