<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Refund of excess IGST on exports cannot be denied for a clerical GSTR-3B reporting error.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103996</link>
    <description>Excess IGST paid twice on export supplies is refundable where export turnover and IGST liability were correctly reported in GSTR-1 but mistakenly classified under supplies other than zero-rated supplies in GSTR-3B. The mismatch prevented automated customs refund, leading to a second IGST payment through a corrected return; refund of that second payment did not extinguish the claim for the original excess payment. A clerical reporting error, supported by return reconciliation, does not constitute a substantive breach justifying denial. Retaining tax paid twice would lack authority of law, and refund cannot be denied on procedural grounds or the stated limitation objection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:57:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:57:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924369" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Refund of excess IGST on exports cannot be denied for a clerical GSTR-3B reporting error.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103996</link>
      <description>Excess IGST paid twice on export supplies is refundable where export turnover and IGST liability were correctly reported in GSTR-1 but mistakenly classified under supplies other than zero-rated supplies in GSTR-3B. The mismatch prevented automated customs refund, leading to a second IGST payment through a corrected return; refund of that second payment did not extinguish the claim for the original excess payment. A clerical reporting error, supported by return reconciliation, does not constitute a substantive breach justifying denial. Retaining tax paid twice would lack authority of law, and refund cannot be denied on procedural grounds or the stated limitation objection.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 08:57:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=103996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>