<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53950</link>
    <description>Clearances for World Bank aided projects were treated as deemed exports, so no excise duty was otherwise payable. Where duty had been paid at clearance and refund was later claimed, the Board&#039;s Circular No. 220/54/96-CX dated 04.06.1996 supported cash refund even when unutilised Modvat credit was involved. On that basis, the view that refund had to be granted only by credit to the Cenvat/Modvat account was rejected, and cash refund was upheld as the correct mode of relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 11:08:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 229 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53950</link>
      <description>Clearances for World Bank aided projects were treated as deemed exports, so no excise duty was otherwise payable. Where duty had been paid at clearance and refund was later claimed, the Board&#039;s Circular No. 220/54/96-CX dated 04.06.1996 supported cash refund even when unutilised Modvat credit was involved. On that basis, the view that refund had to be granted only by credit to the Cenvat/Modvat account was rejected, and cash refund was upheld as the correct mode of relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=53950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>