<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (9) TMI 1870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471820</link>
    <description>Best-judgment assessment for non-filing cannot continue where annual and monthly GST returns disclose the relevant supplies and delayed monthly filing leaves no revenue implication. Annual GSTR-9 disclosure of inward and outward supplies may demonstrate substantive compliance despite late GSTR-3B filing, subject to statutory action for any identified return discrepancy. Rectification of an assessment remains subject to the prescribed limitation period; an application made nearly two years after the assessment was treated as time-barred. Consequently, the non-filer assessment was set aside, while rejection of the delayed rectification request remained undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 08:22:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=924255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (9) TMI 1870 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471820</link>
      <description>Best-judgment assessment for non-filing cannot continue where annual and monthly GST returns disclose the relevant supplies and delayed monthly filing leaves no revenue implication. Annual GSTR-9 disclosure of inward and outward supplies may demonstrate substantive compliance despite late GSTR-3B filing, subject to statutory action for any identified return discrepancy. Rectification of an assessment remains subject to the prescribed limitation period; an application made nearly two years after the assessment was treated as time-barred. Consequently, the non-filer assessment was set aside, while rejection of the delayed rectification request remained undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=471820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>